LinkWithin

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

FORWARD MESSAGE!

Photobucket

Eat less red meat, Government scientists warn


Eat less red meat, Government scientists warn

Britons will be warned that they must cut their consumption of red meat to reduce the risk of cancer, following official advice from the Government scientists.

Britons will be warned that they must cut their consumption of red meat to reduce the risk of cancer, following unprecedented advice from the Government's scientists.
Consumers will be told to eat no more than 500g (1.1lb) of red or processed meat each week Photo: CHRISTOPHER JONES
Consumers will be told to eat no more than 500g (1.1lb) of red or processed meat each week, or 70g (2.5oz) a day, under recommendations to be issued by the Coalition this week.
The daily total is the equivalent of three rashers of bacon – while the weekly amount would be reached by eating one large steak, a pork chop, two sausages and a small portion of beef bolognese sauce.
A Coalition source said: "It is important that people are not put off eating red meat entirely – but it would be irresponsible to ignore the potential health risks. The advice is very clear."
The recommendations will follow the publication of a full report by the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition, which is due within days. The findings are expected to echo the committee's draft report, which found that lower consumption of both red and processed meat would probably reduce the risk of bowel cancer, the second most common cause of cancer death in Britain.
The experts will say the full study has confirmed the link between higher meat consumption and cancer, but is not able to quantify this fully, partly because of the complexity of the data examined, which stretches back to 1998.
Nevertheless, the experts will advise that consumers should reduce their daily red meat intake to 70g.
This is the current average across the whole population, but among those who eat red meat, consumption is likely to be considerably higher because an estimated six million people eat none, including 3.6 million vegetarians.
The experts will warn of particular risks to the third of the adult population consuming more than 100g (3.5oz) a day. Current advice, which dates from 1998, suggested 90g (3.2oz) a day was a healthy amount, and that people only needed to cut back on red meat if they were eating more than 140g (5oz) every day.
Links between red meat and cancer, which have been suggested by a series of scientific studies, have provoked long-running controversy.
In 2005, a European study found those who regularly ate 160g (5.6oz) of red meat a day increased their risk of bowel cancer by one third.
High consumption of red and processed meat has also been linked to many other cancers, including that of the breast, bladder, stomach and digestive organs, but the evidence is weaker.
In 2007, the World Cancer Research Fund recommended a limit of 500g (1.1lb) a week.
Controversially, it said people should eat no more than 70g (2.5oz) of processed meat a week and that children should never have the products, which include ham, sausages and bacon.
The advice this week is not expected to put a specific limit on the amount of processed meats people can safely eat within the overall red meat limit. Last year, Sir Liam Donaldson, the then Chief Medical Officer for England, said cutting consumption of all meat by 30 per cent would prevent 18,000 premature deaths a year.
There are several theories about why high consumption of red meat increases the chance of developing cancer.
Scientists believe a pigment found in red meat damages the DNA of cells lining the digestive system – and DNA damage is one of the first signs of cancer. Burning meat is also thought to increase the risks. In addition, some studies suggest that preservatives used in processed meat could increase risks.
Studies have also suggested links between red meat and heart disease and type 2 diabetes. Obesity increases the risks of many diseases, and some research has suggested that those who avoid red meat tend to weigh less.
The report, drawn up by 17 scientists, doctors and nutritionists, is also expected to say doctors and health visitors should make sure that groups at risk of iron deficiency – including toddlers, girls, women of reproductive age and the elderly – have enough of the element, and that some should be given supplements.
The meat industry is likely to fiercely defend the role of red meat in a balanced diet.
Last week, a report by the British Nutrition Foundation, partly funded by the British Pig Executive and the English Beef and Lamb Executive, said there was no evidence of any link between average red meat consumption levels and cancer, and that research connecting meat-eating with cardiovascular disease was inconclusive.
A Department of Health spokesman said: “The department will be publishing the committee of independent experts’ report on iron and health shortly. Meat can be eaten in moderation as part of a healthy diet.”

Revealed: Oral sex is ‘bigger cause of throat cancer than tobacco’ Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1358845/Oral-sex-bigger-cause-throat-cancer-tobacco.html#ixzz1Ebx89LLa


Revealed: Oral sex is ‘bigger cause of throat cancer than tobacco’

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER
Last updated at 11:03 AM on 21st February 2011
A virus spread during oral sex is now the main cause of throat cancer in people under 50, scientists have warned.
They say the human papilloma virus spread during unprotected sex is to blame for a disturbing rise in potentially deadly oral cancers in the last few decades.
Doctors have called for boys to be vaccinated against HPV just like teenage girls to stop the spread of the disease.
HPV: The Human Papilloma Virus is now thought to be the main cause of throat cancer in people under 50, scientists have warned
HPV: The Human Papilloma Virus is now thought to be the main cause of throat cancer in people under 50, scientists have warned
HPV is best known as the cause of around 70 per cent of cervical cancers. Since 2008, girls have been vaccinated against the virus aged 12 and 13 in schools.
However, it can also cause warts, verrucas and other cancers.
Cancers of the mouth and oropharynx - the top of the throat - used to be mainly diagnosed in older men who drink or smoke. But increasingly, it is being seen in younger men.
Prof Maura Gillison of Ohio State University in Columbus said the sexually transmitted HPV was a bigger cause of some oral cancers than tobacco. 
She said: 'We don’t know from strict scientific evidence whether the vaccine will protect from oral HPV infections that lead to cancer. Those of us in the field are optimistic it will – the vaccines in every anatomical site looked at so far have been shown to be extraordinarily effective, about 90 per cent effective, at preventing infections.'
'When one of my patients asks whether or not they sound vaccinate their sons, I say certainly.'
Girls aged 12 and 13 are offered the HPV vaccine on the NHS to protect against cervical cancer - a disease that kills nearly 1,000 women every year in the UK. The jab is given at school in three doses over six months.
Doctors are increasingly concerned that the sexually transmitted virus is behind a rise in cancer. 
Worrying: the sexually transmitted HPV was a bigger cause of some oral cancers than tobacco
Worrying: the sexually transmitted HPV was a bigger cause of some oral cancers than tobacco
In Britain the incidence of throat cancer is rising sharply while in the US the incidence of oral cancers linked to HPV have doubled in the last 20 years.
In Sweden in the 1970s around a quarter of tonsil cancers were linked to HPV, but by the mid 2000s the figure was 90 per cent said Prof Gillison.
'That’s the most compelling data in a population that the increase in tonsular cancer or oropharynx cancer incidence we’re seeing in a number of places worldwide is possible caused by HPV,' she said.
Someone infected with HPV 16 - the strain linked to oral cancer- has a 14 fold increase in risk for getting oropharynx cancer, she said.
She added: 'What is most strongly linked to oral HPV infection is the number of sexual partners someone has had in their lifetimes, in particular the number of individuals on whom they have performed oral sex. 
'The higher the number of partners that you’ve had, the greater the odds that you’d have an oral infection.'
Yesterday, researchers told the American Association for the Advancement of Science conference in Washington CD that teenagers consider oral sex to be 'casual, socially acceptable, inconsequential and significantly less risk to their health than “real” sex.'
Last year a study at Johns Hopkins University found that HPV posed a greater risk in contracting cancer than smoking or alcohol.
Vaccine: Doctors want boys to be given treatment to protect them against the virus
Vaccine: Doctors want boys to be given treatment to protect them against the virus
The American study of 300 people showed that those with more than six partners were almost nine times at greater risk of contracting the disease while those who had already experienced a previous oral HPV infection were 32 times more likely to develop cancer.
Most HPV infections have no symptoms and people often do not need treatment.
Sara Hiom, Cancer Research UK’s director of health information, said: 'Cancers in the mouth and throat are on the increase and rates have been rising dramatically in the UK since the mid 1980s, especially in people in their 40s, 50s and 60s. 
'The proportion of these cancers that appear to be related to infection by HPV is also increasing.
'But while it’s reasonable to assume that HPV vaccination in girls and boys would protect against these cancers, there is as yet no evidence as to whether the current HPV vaccines are effective at preventing them. 
'The trials done to date have looked at cervical cancer or genital warts as endpoints, so we need new studies to show effectiveness against these HPV-related head and neck cancers. 
'Yet most oral cancers diagnosed in people over 50 in the UK are still related to tobacco and alcohol use.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1358845/Oral-sex-bigger-cause-throat-cancer-tobacco.html#ixzz1EbwVyswf

Lemon is a miraculous product to kill cancer cells


Lemon is a miraculous product to kill cancer cells

Why does this not surprise me.
Let us know what you think about this .
All the Best.
Lou  & Debbie 
======================
Institute of Health Sciences
819 N. L.L.C. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 1201.

This is the latest in medicine, effective for cancer!
Lemon (Citrus) is a miraculous product to kill cancer cells. It is 10,000 times stronger than chemotherapy. Why do we not know about that? Because there are laboratories interested in making a synthetic version that will bring them huge profits. You can now help a friend in need by letting him know that lemon juice is beneficial in preventing the disease. Its taste is pleasant and it does not produce the horrific effects of chemotherapy. If you can, plant a lemon tree in your garden or patio. How many people die while this is a closely guarded secret so as not to jeopardize the beneficial multimillionaires large corporations? As you know, the lemon tree is down, does not occupy much space and is known for its varieties of lemons and limes. You can eat the fruit in different ways: you can eat the pulp, juice press, prepare drinks, sorbets, pastries, ... It is credited with many virtues, but the most interesting is the effect it produces on cysts and tumors. This plant is a proven remedy against cancers of all types. Some say it is very useful in all variants of cancer. It is considered also as an anti microbial spectrum against bacterial infections and fungi, effective against internal parasites and worms, it regulates blood pressure which is too high and an antidepressant, combats stress and nervous disorders.
The source of this information is fascinating: it comes from one of the largest drug manufacturers in the world, says that after more than 20 laboratory tests since 1970, the extracts revealed that: It destroys the malignant cells in 12 cancers, including colon, breast, prostate, lung and pancreas ... The compounds of this tree showed 10,000 times better than the product Adriamycin, a drug normally used chemotherapeutic in the world, slowing the growth of cancer cells. And what is even more astonishing: this type of therapy with lemon extract not only destroys malignant cancer cells and does not affect healthy cells.


Institute of Health Sciences
819 N. L.L.C. Cause Street
Baltimore, MD1201